Roll Your Own Matrix, Part 2

If my last post bored you, there is no hope for you. I dare say that you should be voting Democrat as you will be living off welfare checks for the rest of your life by ignoring my advice.

If my last post intrigued you, and you said “hey, why don’t I learn a little programming, as a hobby of sorts” – this post is for you.

Let me again sell the merits of VBA, from a coding perspective.

  1. You can “program” with no code at all, or use the Macro Recorder as a testing tool. If you want to do something but don’t know how to code it, use the Macro Recorder to do it first. Or, if you just don’t want to take the time to code, you can use the Macro Recorder for that.
  2. VBA was designed as a teaching language. It’s called “BASIC” for a reason. It’s so easy a caveman can do it, metaphorically speaking.
  3. The same syntax is used for every Office application. Word, Excel, Outlook, PowerPoint, Access, Visio, etc., etc. all use VBA in its standard form. Obviously, certain programming “objects” are different depending on the program (Excel deals with cells while Word uses paragraphs), but the style remains consistent.
  4. Intellisense. Like predictive text for your phone, the VB Editor attempts to divine what you’re trying to do. You don’t have to remember a specific object or property – the Editor will attempt to help you through that. Crucial for those who don’t want to have print-outs of programming vocabulary.
  5. VBA scripts can be automated or called on demand. Say, for instance, that I want a specific format to be applied to a word. Let’s say that every time I type “government,” I want it highlighted in red and black with devil ears on the side. I can have the program do that formatting every time it sees “government,” or I can have that program called at the press of a button. Your call.

If you’re looking to start with VBA for Word, look here for more.

If you’re looking to start with VBA for Excel, look here for more.

If you’re looking to start with VBA for Outlook, look here for more.

If you’re looking to start with PowerPoint or Access, don’t. While they work just the same, PPT and Access are not as easy to code given their nature. Word, Excel or Outlook would be better for first attempts.

Enjoy…

Donning the Red Cap of Liberty

July 14, 2010 George 2 comments

Today, le quatorze Juillet, the French celebrate their independence from the tyrannical rule of King Louis XVI who, by the time of the end of his reign, had totally destroyed the glory days of Louis XIV, the Sun King. Today, Americans should bite their tongues and express gratitude for the sacrifices the French made in the late 18th century to help turn the tide against the British in our own Revolutionary War – sacrifices that sunk France into such a debt as to cause revolution there too.

"Aux armes!" (French for "To arms!")

On July 14, 1789, French revolutionists, identifiable by their red head coverings – also known as the red cap of liberty – stormed the Bastille prison, freeing all 7 of its prisoners. This seems silly, but storming the Bastille Prison would be akin to, say, toppling the IRS headquarters on Constitution Avenue in Washington, DC – at night, when 7 janitors were emptying wastepaper baskets.

Okay, okay – stop laughing and be serious: it was a symbolic strike against tyrannical power in Paris. The toppling of the prison paved the way for the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, a political/legal and philosophical/metaphysical document that established first principles for man’s freedom, equality, and duty to others (liberté, égalité, fraternité).

Washington correspondent for Agence France-Presse (AFP) Olivier Knox (@OKnox on Twitter, and one among 50 journalists that Craft Media/Digital recommends following) passes along this clip from the American film Casablanca – a stirring rendition of La Marseillaise (the French national anthem), sung in Rick’s café to drown out the Nazis singing the Reich’s anthem:

Incidentally, this is one of only two films in history that showcases La Marseillaise in its entirety – I have blogged previously about the other film in which it appears.

Americans and Brits alike love to joke often about the French. We think they’re stuffy and snotty about their food (and ours), and unappreciative of the sacrifices we made on their behalf in World War II. And let’s face it – a lot of that stuff is frickin’ hilarious:

But today – Bastille Day – we shouldn’t laugh off the causes of personal liberty and economic freedom. Culturally, the French behave to each other’s faces the way Americans behave in the political blogosphere (read: often behind a veil of anonymity or geospatial distance – kind of makes us seem a bit cowardly in our political discourse) – and despite their hostile disagreements, they are still, at the end of the day, proud to be French and proud to be free. Today, we should all don the red cap of liberty, and celebrate the independence of our quirky cousins, the French.

Conservatives, Libertarians, and Purity Tests: Can These Groups Win Without Each Other?

July 14, 2010 George 1 comment

After running across this piece in the Economist today, I was reminded of that timeless adage “You’ll attract more flies with honey than with vinegar.” That’s a woefully good reminder for the Right as Election Day draws nearer.

Plenty of noise has been made in the past few weeks about the abrupt resignation/firing of Dave Weigel from the Washington Post blog “Right Now.” I have been a defender of Weigel’s, in large part because I think people’s expectations of Weigel were too high – and that’s not to disparage Weigel at all, whose work I have followed for a couple of years. The problem was, in my view, that lots of activists expected him to counter Ezra Klein’s “Wonk Book” with an editorial style, using his platform at the Post to propel the Tea Party to the revery where so many believed it belonged. Another part of the problem is that, as Dan Gainor at the Media Research Center notes, the Post was never clear about why it had hired Weigel in the first place. Reporting? Check. Opinion? Maybe? I still think Weigel does a good job of reporting, and if he’s guilty of anything, it’s a preoccupation with man-bites-dog narratives. Aside from all that, I don’t have much to add to the gallons of punditry sloshing around the Internet about Weigel-gate.

The reason I bring Weigel’s short-lived stint at the Post back up for discussion is that the reaction from the activist community to Weigel’s resignation – particularly on Twitter – was pretty vicious, with lots of “Good riddance” and “we told you so.” Then came the announcement that Weigel would be a paid MSNBC contributor on Countdown with Keith Olbermann – and activists were once again a-Twitter with disgust. Thankfully there was an equivalent outpouring of support for Weigel. I disagree with Keith Olbermann frequently, particularly when it comes to his sneering punditry and progressive worldview. I appreciate that he was the first (and for a long time only) mainstream media personality to cover the devastating flooding in my hometown of Nashville earlier this year, and he and I share in New York Yankees fan-dom. But why the Weigel witch-hunt on the Right?

And then it hit me: the Right and center-right are still obsessed with (plagued by?) litmus tests that, unchecked, can be impossible to pass. And not normal litmus tests either – sure, nobody wants to see another John McCain presidential campaign – I mean the conservative base is so energized right now that it has become bloodthirsty, and it’s beginning to feed on itself. Long-time allies to conservatives – the libertarians – have begun to take notice.

I urge everyone to check out this written exchange between Cato Institute’s Brink Lindsey, AEI/National Review Online’s Jonah Goldberg, and FreedomWorks’ Matt Kibbe, a debate on where libertarians belong on the 21st century ideological spectrum, and how they can, should, and might play in the activist/political component of the Tea Party movement. Romantic libertarians like yours truly hope wistfully one day to inform a more rigorous social policy agenda – one that actually gets government out of people’s lives, including their marriages and sex lives – to complement existing tenets of economic freedom upon which, for the most part, everyone right-of-center seems to reaching consensus. But because of these purity tests, many libertarians worry that the emergence of centrist rhetoric at Tea Party rallies is nothing more than a ruse to grab handfuls of votes on Election Day 2010 and 2012, and then Big Government conservatism does us all in – again.

Remember: if the base were 100% correct, they'd be in power, and would never have to relinquish that power because they'd always be right.

I am sympathetic to Brink Lindsey’s point in this respect. Libertarians – who often sacrifice opportunities to “get involved” in lieu of safeguarding transcendent philosophical values for the sake of practical virtue – should not compromise their core beliefs just because Sarah Palin said we need less government and more personal responsibility. But I also think Matt Kibbe makes great points – the Tea Party movement is as fascinating a paradigm shift in American politics as I will likely ever see in my lifetime. It has unbundled the Left almost completely, who has tried to use every tool at its disposal – from race-baiting in formal media outlets to unscientific opinion polling – to couch the Tea Party movement as garden-variety Republican, and quintessentially racist, xenophobic, and homophobic. Kibbe insists that many Tea Partiers don’t know where to place themselves on an ideological scale, and notes that many have never been involved in political discourse before now. This groundswell provides libertarians with that romantic opportunity to inform the policy debate – especially issues like gay marriage, which Tea Party groups support, and like Kibbe, I think it’s hasty to accept Lindsey’s premise with open arms. So Lindsey’s libertarian protectionism can be just as dangerous and self-defeating as the Gainor conservative witch-hunts.

The Tea Party movement is still today very fragile, despite the noise the movement has made and the support it has drummed up. If libertarians and conservatives can agree about anything, it’s opposition to power-drunk Democrats; it’s probably best that everyone focus on that for now, instead of running rampant and reckless with purity tests – and when Republicans win, it will be up to them to follow through on promises they’re making to people getting involved for the first time. Those people don’t know where they lie on the ideological spectrum, but they know that the government is screwing them.

Cross-posted at TheNextRight.com.

Roll Your Own Matrix

From time to time, it amuses me to extend my prophecies from the general “state of affairs” sort of postings to a style that might be known as “wisdom from the mountains.” I find myself in such an evening tonight.

Below, in referencing the sage analysis of Mr. Rajan, I mused that education will continue to have a disproportionate effect on the job prospects of many Americans as we continue to drift toward a service economy.  I believe that many service workers will benefit from having programming knowledge of any sort. My reasons are as follows:

  1. We are increasingly a computer-based economy. Few (to no) offices are computer-less, and most tasks that were done manually are now keyed into a computer. You know all this, so let’s move on.
  2. Programming demonstrates a control over a computer far beyond that of the average employee. If you and I have equal communication skills, are equally well-liked by our co-workers, have comparable intelligence but I can control my work tool better, who has a stronger set of skills? It’s the difference between using a hammer or using a nail gun, if we have an equal knowledge of architecture.
  3. Programming might just get you out of having to go into the office. Let us say that you demonstrate epic productivity in the office, via well-executed programming skills. Who is better positioned to apply to work from home – you, or your co-worker who always looks like he’s struggling to stay afloat? You, of course. Which leads me to my next point..
  4. Programming can help you eliminate stress. Let us say that you periodically receive an email with invoices from a supplier. And let us say that you always have to save these invoices to a certain folder before processing. What if you could program your email application to just pull the attachments out and save them without you having to deal with it? Wouldn’t that save you, say, 15 seconds an email? If you’re getting 40 of those a week, every week – that’s a lot of seconds saved. Clearly, you can come up with your own ideas here.

The typical stigma is that someone who knows how to program must be a special kind of computer geek who prefers to sit in a lab and not talk to anyone all day. Yet, everyone respects said computer geek because he churns out a fine product and makes all the stuff work around the office. THEREFORE, if you could combine his skill-set with your innate ability to win friends and influence people – well then, you have won yourself a promotion.

“But Prophet!” say thee. “How would I learn to program? I cannot go back to school right now and I don’t have time after work to learn this myself.”

FEAR NOT,” say I. “Learn VBA instead.”

VBA is a programming language built into Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook – the entire Office suite. This language can only be fully utilized by individuals running Windows and MS Office – which I imagine is most of your corporate lives. For the rest of you, sorry. You can learn something else.

VBA stands for “Visual BASIC for Applications.” It was initially designed as a training language for new programmers, but has since been fully integrated into Office as a customization tool. Allow me to get you started..

  1. Open Word or Excel. Type a phrase for some dummy text. Then find your “Macro Editor,” which will be in a different place if you’re using Office 2003 or 2007.
  2. Click Record Macro. Then, do something to the text. Highlight it, bold it, delete it. Go crazy. Then Stop Recording.
  3. Make some more dummy text. Then go to Macros, and run your Macro. BAM. It will repeat the exact same stuff you just recorded, automatically. “HOLY CRAP,” you say. “I JUST PROGRAMMED.”
  4. Then you say “wait, Prophet. I thought programming was all codes and variables and suchlike.” Well, you see, it is. Microsoft just created the code for you.
  5. Hit Alt+F11 on your keyboard, and the VBA Editor will pop up. Then you shall see your mystical “code.” Voila. You have programme.

Granted, these are only the most basic (pun?) examples. Office allows you to create those little automated fragments of code, but you can get into much greater detail if you learn the language. This is an area where I, being a generous man, will gladly start you off on the path. If you wish for further direction in these matters, say it in the comments.

Who knows? Maybe one day, your job will depend on it.

Where Do Libertarians Belong?

July 12, 2010 George Leave a comment

That’s the subject of this event I’m attending tonight at Reason Magazine. Matt Kibbe of FreedomWorks, Jonah Goldberg of National Review Online, and Brink Lindsey of the Cato Institute will have it out about “where libertarians belong” in American politics. This has, of course, been an interesting and important question this election cycle, since libertarians make up a sizeable contingent of the Tea Party movement.

As much as I think it’s cool to be able to blog from my phone, live-blogging will probably be kept to a minimum for this. I will probably tweet more than blog in long form, because I’m interested to see where an activist, a journalist, and a think tank scholar believe libertarians can/will/should play in American politics. If you’re not on Twitter, you can click here and just refresh the page a lot.

Update 1

So I didn’t actually tweet a whole lot. Jonah Goldberg said something funny though…he said “For the record, I never really jived with George W. Bush’s philosophy, the whole ‘compassionate conservatism’ thing…My name is ‘Goldberg,’ I tend to be a little more Old Testament…I like my conservatism with a little more smite and wrath.”

Update 2

It doesn’t look like they have video of the event turned around and uploaded yet, but you can check back at either Reason’s YouTube channel (which is chock full of other good stuff), or Reason.TV. I’m sure the video will be up in another day or two.

On Rajan’s Explanation for the U.S. Recession

Raghuram Rajan, the former chief economist of the IMF and a Chicago professor, has a completely different take on the U.S. recession. There are different reasons for the global recession – not all of them tied to the fact that the U.S. economy is just freaking huge – but his explanation is fantastic.

I’ll summarize Mr. Rajan’s article:

  1. Wages have been growing much faster for workers in the 90th percentile of the wage distribution than those in the 50th percentile. Technology has changed rapidly since then, and growth reached fever pitch in the ’90s. Those who had the necessary skills – or the education necessary to learn those skills – could advance. If all you had to offer the American economy was the strength of your back, your job got outsourced. Just look at the chart here. If you’ve got a professional degree, you only have a 2.3% chance of being unemployed. If you only have a high school degree, that’s 9.7%.
  2. Rajan: “The everyday consequence for the middle class is a stagnant paycheck and growing job insecurity. Politicians feel their constituents’ pain, but it is hard to improve the quality of education, for improvement requires real and effective policy change in an area where too many vested interests favor the status quo. Moreover, any change will require years to take effect, and therefore will not address the electorate’s current anxiety.”
  3. Thus, politicians opted instead to make credit easy to come by. Rather than the middle class utilizing the new credit facilities to go back to school, they bought houses. And keep in mind that the ease of credit was aided by Fannie and Freddie, but it can’t be blamed totally on them – Glass-Steagall had to be repealed as well.
  4. Rajan: “The problem, as often is the case with government policies, was not intent. It rarely is. But when lots of easy money pushed by a deep-pocketed government comes into contact with the profit motive of a sophisticated, competitive, and amoral financial sector, matters get taken far beyond the government’s intent.”

Before all is said and done, we will witness the U.S. in decline in a global economy that knows how to educate its populace. Unless, of course, the government takes the steps to improve the long-term educational capabilities of our fine nation. And for all that Mr. Obama has done wrong, he at least has not wholesale supported the teachers’ union as I expected. Union-busting will help, but America had better be emotionally ready to stop “blaming the teacher” for everything that has gone wrong. The baby boomer generation supported lower expectations of their children at school and grade inflation – something that will need to go away as well.

Oh, and if you’re in the workforce now, you’d better start educating yourself on something you don’t know how to do. Chances are, your job will depend on it one day.

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Austerity

"Market sentiment"

Congratulations, good Republicans, you terrified the nation with talk of “deflation” and “1932″ and various things of that nature. All the while, your various and sundry discussions of market panic drove investors into things like Treasury bills and U.S. dollars, allowing the Good President Obama to continue his spending plans at any cost.

Let me tell you, sirs, that on a classical level, austerity should not result in anything but epic pain for investors. Yet, in a contradiction to my previous post, I am going to condone the use of austerity in the name of market sentiment.

In a move that doesn’t make any damn sense whatsoever, Americans are begging and pleading for less money. Indeed, I think many of them are willing to take personal hits to their own pension plans, provided that the unions take hits to theirs (granted, I would have thought that actually owning a company like GM would be an embarrassing enough hit, but whatever). I foresee, much in the same way that Democrats took Congress in 2006 after Mr. Bush had proven himself to be a fantastic jogger but not much of a president, that Republicans of the “Paul” variety will come into Congress in spades. Not that there will be enough of them to do foolish things like get rid of the Federal Reserve, but perhaps they shall make a stir.

After said Republicans offer a referendum on the Good President Obama’s fiscal policy, Mr. Obama will finally turn out to not be that bad of a president after all. Rather, I imagine he will turn out to actually be a true tight-budgeter, and will welcome the inevitable “corrections” to his earlier policies. Thus, Mr. Obama will be re-elected in 2012, just in time for the world to end.

He'll still be here. Don't worry.

All these things being said, I believe our most pressing issues in the economy can be solved with austerity. Our economy is run by right-leaning individuals with anger in their hearts (read: corporate CEOs and various smaller business leaders), while the government is run by political science majors who are quite sure they know what is best for the world. It is unfortunate, but the economy is currently being held hostage by pissed-off baby boomers who lack the requisite courage to stick their neck on the line and make some deals, Cornelius Vanderbilt style.

Unrelated.

If an austerity pitch injects confidence into business, then maybe our people will start putting some of that cash to work. It is good for the health of the country that consumers are paying down debt and not spending at the moment, but now it’s time to really give the people what they want. Britain’s doing it. Why can’t we?

Black Panthers, Queen Elizabeth, Condoms, and NASA – Evening Reading – July 8, 2010

July 8, 2010 George 1 comment

Today was a bit of a busy day at the office for me – I apologize for not getting an Afternoon Reading post completed. Tonight’s Evening Reading is a bit long – I may break up my “aggregation-plus” and post a new Late Night Reading…we’ll see. Here goes: TWEET OF THE DAY – Honors today go to Jim Geraghty, blogger at the National Review’s Campaign Spot for this little zinger: You can follow Jim on Twitter at @jimgeraghty. Just don’t lap up his pith. HEADLINE OF THE DAY – Some things need no commentary, but I’m guessing that little prank will probably ruffle a few feathers at Reuters. My thanks to a friend (who should probably remain anonymous) for passing that little ditty along. I TOLD YOU IT WAS INCREDIBLE – My phone isn’t the only Android on the market, but that doesn’t matter; smart phones running the Android platform have tripled their market share over the past few months:

Android phone saw the most significant growth in market share in May, up 4.0 percentage points to capture 13.0 percent of smartphone subscribers. Of course, despite Android’s gain, RIM and Apple dominated, with RIM taking 41.7 percent share of U.S. smartphone subscribers, followed by Apple with 24.4 percent share. Microsoft saw a 13.2 percent share and Palm rounded the top five out with a 4.8 percent share. In total, 49.1 million people in the U.S. owned smartphones during the three months ending in May, up 8.1 percent from the corresponding February period.

IT’S A SIN TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD – Harper Lee’s hometown in Alabama holds a Boo-fest (that’s Boo Radley) to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the publish of To Kill A Mockingbird:

From July 8 to 11 they’ll give tours of the historic downtown, stage a marathon reading, and auction off a signed copy. They’ll do it all cautiously out of respect for (and maybe a little fear of) the town’s most famous resident: Nelle Harper Lee.

MERCY IS FOR THE WEAK…SEMPER FI, KOBRA KAI! – Some really smart people have figured out that human beings are more inclined to trample the weak for fear of losing posture than to challenge the strong for the glory:

The new study contradicts earlier research showing that when faced with a superior opponent in similar creative language tasks, people tend to work harder. But unlike the current study, which involved competition between ranked schools, the earlier studies did not involve a threat to the competitors’ preexisting real-world status. So an other motivating factor for the students in the new study could be the fact that performing worse than people of lower rank can mean a loss of status, says psychologist Naomi Ellemers of Leiden University in the Netherlands, who was not involved in the study.

STOP THE PRESSES – No wait, false alarm. NPR was just hopping on the train that the rest of the universe has been on for awhile:

NPR says it’s abbreviating the name it has used since its debut in 1971 because it’s more than radio these days. Its news, music and informational programming is heard over a variety of digital devices that aren’t radios; it also operates news and music Web sites. Hence: “NPR is more modern, streamlined,” says Vivian Schiller, NPR’s chief executive. She points to other “re-brandings” by media organizations, such as Cable News Network, which has been plain old CNN for years.

AND A STORY FROM NATIONAL PUB-…WAIT, “NPR” – Performance evaluations are bullshit. Maybe not, but I thought it would be funny to make a joke about how stupid NPR’s announcement is:

The problem with the practice, Culbert tells NPR’s Renee Montagne, is that periodic reviews create circumstances that help neither the employee nor the company to improve. As Culbert and his co-author, Larry Rout, write in their book, Get Rid of the Performance Review! annual reviews do not promote candid discussions about problems in the workplace — and their potential solutions. Instead, Culbert says, when workers undergo a review, “They’re going to talk about all their successes — it becomes total baloney.”

CARTOON OF THE DAY – And the public sector ones are the worst: SITTIN’ ON A F_CKIN’ GOLD MINE – “Hot Rod” Blagoevich and Joe F_cking Biden would probably be pals. This, from a reporter covering the trial, recounting the playing of phone tapes:

The governor, clearly on edge this Election Day, unleashes his frustrations toward the Illinois public. “Now is the time to put my f——children and my wife first for a change,” Blagojevich is heard saying. “I f—— busted my a– … I gave your f—— baby health care… What do I get for that? Only 13 percent of you think I’m doing a good job, so f— all of you.”

Seriously, if you’re on Twitter, and you’re not following @joefuckingbiden, you should be. WHAT DO YOU GET WHEN YOU CROSS ROGAINE WITH VIAGRA? – A Florida judge dismisses a defamation suit brought against ESPN by former boxing promoter Don King. If I had to guess, I’d probably say the judge laughed the enigmatic Vegas mogul right out of the court room:

The Court of Appeals affirmed on the basis that Don King had failed to present evidence that a genuine issue of fact existed which would allow a jury to find, by clear and convincing evidence, that ESPN had broadcast the subject statements about King with actual malice.  Don King Productions, Inc., et al, vs. The Walt Disney Company, et al. (No. 4D08-3704).

CIVICS LESSON OF THE DAY – On this day (July 8) in 1776, the Liberty Bell rang out from the Pennsylvania State House (now called Independence Hall) in Philadelphia to announce that a Declaration of Independence had been written and agreed to by all 13 colonies. The first public reading ensued:

Four days earlier, the historic document had been adopted by delegates to the Continental Congress, but the bell did not ring to announce the issuing of the document until the Declaration of Independence returned from the printer on July 8.

MY DAD IS BETTER THAN YOUR DAD – Because he’s a doctor AND he’s on Twitter AND Facebook:

But the docs at one Irving, Texas, OB-GYN practice have taken that ubiquitous display of cute kids into the 21st century. Their patients can post photos on the MacArthur OB/GYNFacebook page, where the doctors post news about their practice and the medical world at large. It has more than 600 fans. Jeff Livingston, who spearheaded the practice’s venture into social media, also manages the @ macobgynTwitter account, which has about 1,600 followers. He sees Facebook as an educational and, perhaps just as important, marketing tool. “People are looking for information online,” Livingston says. “I wanted them to look at our page.” But few doctors have embraced social media as enthusiastically as he has. Concerns about time and patient privacy have deterred many.

SHE’S A GOOD SHEILA, BRUCE, AND NOT AT ALL STUCK UP * – Queen Elizabeth II defies conventional attitudes about monarch’s privilege, and announces a tightening of the royal belt as the global economy continues to sag:

Financially ailing Britain is dramatically shifting away from an era of big government, entering a new age of austerity to fend off the same kind of fiscal crisis now gripping Greece. With her subjects facing a bare-bones budget and a bevy of higher taxes, Queen Elizabeth II has launched what some here describe as a preemptive strike against those who say this deeply indebted nation can no longer afford the gilded trappings of its monarchy. The queen is freezing salaries for royal servants and aides earning more than $73,500 and reviewing all vacant slots with an eye to reducing her staff of 1,400 — which includes a royal piper who plays under her window in the mornings and an official counter of swans. For the first time in her 58-year reign, the queen has also agreed to regular audits of royal expenditures by the same national agency that reviews education, defense and other types of government spending.

*Once again, bonus points if you get the reference. OBAMA IS GONNA NEED A LOT OF BEER FOR THE SUMMIT HE’LL NEED AFTER THIS – I don’t like Glenn Beck either, but I doubt very much that the Left will make any noise about these violent racists:

Tommy Christopher: What do you think about the rally that Glenn Beck plans to have on August 28, the anniversary of Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream speech,” at the Lincoln Memorial?…Are you aware of it? Malik Zulu Shabazz: I am aware of it, and that Glenn Beck should not be allowed to have this rally. Glenn Beck is a sneaky little devil, and he does sneaky things, and tries to portray that he’s really not the neo-racist that he really is. And for him to go and to secure the Lincoln Memorial on Dr. King’s birthday will meet not only opposition from civil rights leaders, but it’s going to meet direct opposition from the New Black Panther Party.

WAIT A MINUTE, EGON, I THOUGHT YOU SAID CROSSING THE STREAMS WAS BAD – Twitter’s new business model – using “promoted” tweets to generate revenue – has inadvertently pointed people to rival social media site Facebook:

As you can see when you click on the Promoted Topic, the top tweet is from the PredatorsMovie Twitter account. This promoted tweet reads, “They can hear you, smell you, and see you.#Predators in theaters Friday – http://bit.ly/amt8XE” — that bit.ly link takes you to a Facebook page where the trailer is located. So yes, Twitter is effectively promoting their rival Facebook thanks to this latest ad buy.

THEY’RE PART OF THE PROBLEM, GENIUS – The President has renewed the SAVE Award contest, wherein employees in the Executive branch submit money-saving ideas and then vote on them…somehow, I doubt anyone will say “cut the Federal workforce”:

The second annual SAVE Award will start accepting submissions at http://www.saveaward.gov from Thursday through July 22. Federal employees will be able to rank the submissions submitted by colleagues, and the general public will be able to vote on the top submissions later in the year. The contest winner earns a meeting with President Obama, who will include the winning idea in his fiscal 2012 budget proposal. … “The basic premise here is that many of the best ideas exist on the front line,” said Jeffrey Zients, OMB deputy director. “Those doing the work on the front lines have the best ideas on how to make changes. We want to reach out” to get them.

I’D LIKE TO DEBATE THAT – My friend and former Belmont University philosophy-and-political-science-double-major Ben Bryan doesn’t think debate is valuable:

The problem is that discourse dominated by debate produces people with an insubstantial approach to moral discourse. The deeper trouble is not that debates are shallow and narrow-minded, but that incessant engagement in them produces human beings who are shallow and narrow-minded.

MANUFACTURING ASSENT – Apparently this tactic is growing in popularity among Democrats – holding moderated town halls over the phone instead of meeting constituents face-to-face. It’s gutless, but hey – if I took the drubbing over health care that they did, and I was about to lose my job, I’d probably try it too:

Embattled Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.) — last seen suggesting that minorities are not “good American people” — offered a measure of candor on a local radio station in explaining why he was doing “tele-town halls” instead of traditional ones with his constitutents in the flesh: We’re going to do everything we can to get opinions from people, to meet with people, but I’m not going to set myself up for, you know, nuts to hit me with a camera and ask stupid questions.

PLEASE CONTINUE TO USE CONDOMS – Otherwise, Trojan stocks will crash, and I’m not sure the economy can handle that yet:

U.S. government scientists have discovered three powerful antibodies, the strongest of which neutralizes 91% of HIV strains, more than any AIDS antibody yet discovered. Looking closely at the strongest antibody, they have detailed exactly what part of the virus it targets and how it attacks that site. Together with recent research into how to make animals produce antibodies, the new findings constitute a significant step toward an AIDS vaccine.

NO WONDER THEY’RE WORRYING ABOUT SOCCER PHYSICS, WEBSITES, AND VIDEO GAMES – Maybe I’ve been a little tough on NASA over the last couple of days. After all, they do seem to be pretty rudderless:

Where [Obama's] critics have a point is in arguing that NASA lacks a clear mission. Without a directive and funding, talk of visiting Mars or an asteroid is grandiose but empty. Meanwhile, gauzy nostrums about inspiring children and international cooperation are creating political headaches. Last week, NASA administrator Charles Bolden touched off a storm when he told al Jazeera that the agency’s new mission was to “find a way to reach out to the Muslim world” — surely not what anybody had in mind.

BRILLIANT – I defy you to not laugh as hard as I did. See you in the morning – and maybe late night tonight!

Some Comments on BP, As An Investment

I have recently been asked questions regarding BP as an investment choice. And, for those of you who don’t know, I don’t just randomly get asked questions about investing in large oil companies – I teach an investments class to undergraduates and MBAs. Once again, this information is not provided to you by a registered broker-dealer, nor am I advising you to buy or sell any securities. You do so at your own risk, and at the risk that God may kill a kitten if you do.

BP is currently speaking to sovereign wealth funds in the Middle East and a few companies in Singapore. The company is worried that with market value severely depressed, another oil major will attempt to gobble them up. A sovereign wealth investment could fight that off. Sovereign wealth may reject the investment option, having been burned by Citigroup earlier. Or they may reject it and the stock price falls anyway – blocking a takeover that would force a premium price. Consider that Investment Risk #1, in the book of the Prophet.

Consider also that the well is still not capped. Investment Risk #2.

Consider that the relief well may fail. Investment Risk #3.

The fourth, and perhaps scariest risk, is that the seafloor is compromised beyond repair. If that’s the case, we might have to drill multiple relief wells in an attempt to cap the well. Worst case scenario – this Mount Everest of oil fields just has to empty into the Gulf. Investment Risk #4.

A special note on Investment Risk #4: Warren Buffett used to say that he wouldn’t invest in anything he didn’t understand. I don’t understand geology, and BP is restricting a lot of that information anyway.

I also have not forgotten the Administration’s earlier attempt at climate change legislation, via cap-and-trade and various alternative energy deals. Let’s face it: the BP oil spill is a great marketing tool for any sort of alternative energy plan. I also have complete faith in the Good President Obama’s skill to lampoon the British company with epic lawsuits, much in the same way they did with Goldman Sachs in the SEC case. These things are well within the scope of a Chicago politician. Thus, Investment Risk #5 is the ability of the federal government to make an example out of BP in order to promote its own ends.

In short, I consider the bankruptcy risks of BP to be more than I care to stomach. I prefer companies like RIG or HAL, if you wanted to get in on oil spill plays (/enjoy pure, unmitigated evil). But that’s all mere opinion.

Hot Rod, STAR WARS, and Democratic Politics – Morning Reading – July 8, 2010

July 8, 2010 George 1 comment

THIS WILL PROBABLY DRIVE GUN NUTS NUTTY – A Chicago police officer is murdered with his own weapon, just shortly after the United States Supreme Court decides a case that asserts the right of individuals to keep and bear arms more strongly than ever before:

The 43-year-old officer was killed at 3:48 p.m. at 61st and Racine, outside the old Englewood District police station that is now used by the department’s targeted response and gang enforcement units. At least one other officer shot the suspected robber in the chest, but he was not killed.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

WHO WOULD’VE THUNK IT? – Apparently Hugo Bucher has figured out that life on Earth rebounds much quicker after global natural disasters than paleontologists originally thought:

THE dinosaurs went out with a bang. Most palaeontologists agree that those creatures and much of the rest of Mesozoic life ended when the Earth collided with an asteroid or a comet 65m years ago. But the Mesozoic, too, began with a mass extinction. Some 251m years ago, the efluvia of Siberian volcanoes wiped out 95% of life in the seas, and almost as much on the land, in an episode known as the Great Dying. This was the end of the Permian period, and of the era of life called the Palaeozoic. The survivors regrouped, re-evolved and turned into the Mesozoic species that led eventually to the dinosaurs, pterosaurs, ammonites and belemnites that generations of fossil hunters are familiar with.

How that regrouping happened will be the topic of a presentation by Hugo Bucher, the director of the Palaeontological Institute at the University of Zurich, at the Third International Palaeontological Congress in London on July 3rd. According to Dr Bucher, it occurred faster than anyone had previously thought, but also stuttered on the way as the volcanic activity waxed and waned.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

BUT WEREN’T THEY JUST DUPED BY A RING OF RUSSIAN SPIES? – The NSA has a $100 million program in place to protect critical infrastructure using some kind of embedded network sensors:

The surveillance by the National Security Agency, the government’s chief eavesdropping agency, would rely on a set of sensors deployed in computer networks for critical infrastructure that would be triggered by unusual activity suggesting an impending cyber attack, though it wouldn’t persistently monitor the whole system, these people said.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

“I LOVE YOU.” “I KNOW.” – And she’d have to in order for me to have a cake like this at my wedding:

Spanish for "May the Force Be With You"...that or "Why, you stuck-up...half-witted...scruffy-looking...NERFHERDER!"

____________________________________________________________________________________________

STEP ASIDE, “MA’AM” – Taegan Goddard on tech tycoon Carly Fiorina’s chances of ousting Senator Barbara Boxer from her seat this fall:

A new Field Poll in California shows Sen. Barbara Boxer (D) leads challenger Carly Fiorina (R) by just three points, 47% to 44%.

Boxer’s job approval rating is among the lowest the pollster has measured for her since she was first elected to the Senate in 1992: 48% of likely voters disapprove of her performance while 42% approve.

Said pollster Mark DiCamillio: “She is vulnerable. This is very ominous for her.”

____________________________________________________________________________________________

I FIND YOUR LACK OF FAITH DISTURBING – 100 custom-painted Darth Vader helmets from the 30th Anniversary STAR WARS celebration in 2007 will be auctioned off today in Philadelphia, with a starting bid of $1,500:

The Freeman’s Auction House in Philadelphia is auctioning off 100 Darth Vader helmets this Saturday with an average starting price of $1,500.

Yeah, now we’re talking. And unlike Ford’s model-T, your choice of color is not restricted to black. Instead, every helmet has been customized by an underground artist who started with a full-size prop replica. The collection was completed in 2007 and has been on touring exhibition including appearances in Europe and Japan.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

BARACK OBAMA: GARDEN VARIETY POLITICIAN – “Hot Rod” Blagoevich may be too hot to handle for the Obama White House that tried to throw him under the bus:

Obama — who crusaded against government-by-crony — was dragged into the proceedings last week when a top Chicago labor official testified that Obama tapped him to talk to Blagojevich about the Senate seat.

That testimony – by Tom Balanoff of SEIU Local 1 – is the strongest challenge yet to a White House transition office timeline from December 2008 that lays out the Obama team’s discussions surrounding the efforts to fill the seat.

Balanoff told jurors that he answered Obama’s call on the eve of the presidential election and told the soon-to-be president that he would pitch Jarrett to Blagojevich – but that call isn’t mentioned in the transition team report, prepared by then-incoming White House counsel Greg Craig.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

GOOD LUCK WITH THAT – Yeah, this will probably never happen:

Two interest groups plan to spend as much as $15 million this year on a nationwide campaign in favor of new public-financing legislation aimed at limiting the influence of wealthy donors and large corporations in congressional races.

Common Cause and Public Campaign are making the push on behalf of the Fair Elections Now Act, which would allow lawmakers to qualify for public matching funds by raising money exclusively from small donors. On Thursday, the two groups plan to unveil details about the campaign, which will include TV ads targeting wavering lawmakers and grass-roots efforts in 24 states.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

NO MEANS NO – The President’s Administration sure is spending a lot of time trying to usurp the courts these days – so much for institutional design:

In a court filing late Tuesday, theInterior Department said that the six-month ban on drilling in more than 500 feet of water, imposed in late May, was necessary to allow time to adopt stricter safety and environmental regulation of deepwater wells.

The action has put hundreds of people who operate and service deepwater wells out of work and has brought long-term uncertainty to the Gulf Coast economy. Politicians all along the coast have called the moratorium a case of federal overkill that threatens the livelihood of the region.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

SHOCKER: ADMINISTRATION HIDING POLITICAL PAYOFFS – I made noise here some months back on the results of federal “stimulus” spending; I even gave a run-down of Rep. Jim Cooper’s pet projects (none of which help the middle class):

The website used to track stimulus spending does not meet the transparency requirements laid out by the administration last year, according to a report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

According to the 400-page report, only a quarter of the projects listed onRecovery.gov provide clear and complete information on the cost, schedule, purpose, location and status of stimulus-funded work. Most of the entries on the site provide some of that information, but 7 percent of the entries provide little to no information about how stimulus dollars are being spent, the report said. The study was conducted at the request of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).

____________________________________________________________________________________________

See you this afternoon!