<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Intelligence, Please...</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intelligenceplease.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intelligenceplease.com</link>
	<description>Curiosities from the Buckle of the Bible Belt to the Beltway</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:11:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gunfight in the IP Corral, Part the Third by Jim Eltringham</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/27/gunfight-in-the-ip-corral-part-the-third/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Eltringham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1264#comment-883</guid>
		<description>Good points on Wikileaks.  Although it has a clear political agenda, they are simply releasing information.  I&#039;m more bothered that they were able to get their hands on the info to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points on Wikileaks.  Although it has a clear political agenda, they are simply releasing information.  I&#8217;m more bothered that they were able to get their hands on the info to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wikileaks and the Proverbial Cat and Bag by Wikileaks Is NOT Transparency &#8211; It Is Political Gamesmanship &#171; Intelligence, Please&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/27/wikileaks-and-the-proverbial-cat-and-bag/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikileaks Is NOT Transparency &#8211; It Is Political Gamesmanship &#171; Intelligence, Please&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1258#comment-878</guid>
		<description>[...] Wikileaks Is NOT Transparency &#8211; It Is Political&#160;Gamesmanship  July 27, 2010 George Leave a comment Go to comments    It&#8217;s very rare that I take on one of my own, but I was completely taken aback by Joe The Prophet&#8217;s post on Wikileaks of earlier today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wikileaks Is NOT Transparency &#8211; It Is Political&nbsp;Gamesmanship  July 27, 2010 George Leave a comment Go to comments    It&#8217;s very rare that I take on one of my own, but I was completely taken aback by Joe The Prophet&#8217;s post on Wikileaks of earlier today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wikileaks and the Proverbial Cat and Bag by bosshoghazzard</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/27/wikileaks-and-the-proverbial-cat-and-bag/#comment-877</link>
		<dc:creator>bosshoghazzard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1258#comment-877</guid>
		<description>Good thing I met The Prophet in DC recently. Carry on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thing I met The Prophet in DC recently. Carry on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;D&#8221; is for &#8220;Doublespeak&#8221; &#8211; Is Michelle Obama Kidding? by &#8220;D&#8221; is for &#8220;Doublespeak&#8221; &#8211; Is Michelle Obama Kidding? &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/27/d-is-for-doublespeak-is-michelle-obama-kidding/#comment-876</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;D&#8221; is for &#8220;Doublespeak&#8221; &#8211; Is Michelle Obama Kidding? &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1252#comment-876</guid>
		<description>[...] at Intelligence, Please&#8230; Sharereddit_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Intelligence, Please&#8230; Sharereddit_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roll Your Own Matrix by TonyFord.com</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/14/roll-your-own-matrix/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyFord.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1199#comment-870</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What is Lorem Ipsum...&lt;/strong&gt;

I found your entry interesting thus I&#039;ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What is Lorem Ipsum&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I found your entry interesting thus I&#8217;ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightOnline Day 1 &#8211; &#8220;If you can blog&#8230;BLOG.&#8221; by RightOnline Day 1 &#8211; &#8220;If you can blog&#8230;BLOG.&#8221; &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/23/rightonline-day-1-if-you-can-blog-blog/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>RightOnline Day 1 &#8211; &#8220;If you can blog&#8230;BLOG.&#8221; &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 23:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1245#comment-836</guid>
		<description>[...] at Intelligence, Please&#8230; and The Next Right.  Sharereddit_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Intelligence, Please&#8230; and The Next Right.  Sharereddit_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightOnline Day 1 &#8211; Building Coalitions by RightOnline Day 1 &#8211; Building Coalitions &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/23/rightonline-day-1-building-coalitions/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>RightOnline Day 1 &#8211; Building Coalitions &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 22:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1241#comment-835</guid>
		<description>[...] at Intelligence, Please&#8230; and The Next Right.  Sharereddit_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Intelligence, Please&#8230; and The Next Right.  Sharereddit_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where&#8217;s My PR? by RightOnline 2010: An Activism Odyssey &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/03/20/wheres-my-pr/#comment-823</link>
		<dc:creator>RightOnline 2010: An Activism Odyssey &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=647#comment-823</guid>
		<description>[...] taxation that thrives by inducing false hopes among the financially destitute.&#8221; But Coop is a member of the Blue Dog Coalition, representing the Protestant Vatican, and he would no doubt would reject Clinton&#8217;s idealism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] taxation that thrives by inducing false hopes among the financially destitute.&#8221; But Coop is a member of the Blue Dog Coalition, representing the Protestant Vatican, and he would no doubt would reject Clinton&#8217;s idealism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RightOnline 2010: An Activism Odyssey by RightOnline 2010: An Activism Odyssey &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/22/rightonline-2010-an-activism-odyssey/#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>RightOnline 2010: An Activism Odyssey &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1229#comment-822</guid>
		<description>[...] at Intelligence, Please&#8230; Sharereddit_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Intelligence, Please&#8230; Sharereddit_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where&#8217;s My PR? by RightOnline 2010: An Activism Odyssey &#171; Intelligence, Please&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/03/20/wheres-my-pr/#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>RightOnline 2010: An Activism Odyssey &#171; Intelligence, Please&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=647#comment-821</guid>
		<description>[...] taxation that thrives by inducing false hopes among the financially destitute.&#8221; But Coop is a member of the Blue Dog Coalition, representing the Protestant Vatican, and he would no doubt would reject Clinton&#8217;s idealism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] taxation that thrives by inducing false hopes among the financially destitute.&#8221; But Coop is a member of the Blue Dog Coalition, representing the Protestant Vatican, and he would no doubt would reject Clinton&#8217;s idealism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failin&#8217; Sarah Palin by George</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/18/failin-sarah-palin/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1218#comment-813</guid>
		<description>No, this isn&#039;t my best argument against her - I&#039;ve made that in other forums...I&#039;ll try to get you a link. I thought she was a very, VERY interesting pick for McCain when she was announced - the whole glass-ceiling-Barry-passing-on-Hillary thing - and she seemed confident and competent enough at first...and then the Couric interview came...she&#039;s been fighting for her political life ever since, and people LOVE her. Her lack of education is a major concern for me, and that was the ethos of this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, this isn&#8217;t my best argument against her &#8211; I&#8217;ve made that in other forums&#8230;I&#8217;ll try to get you a link. I thought she was a very, VERY interesting pick for McCain when she was announced &#8211; the whole glass-ceiling-Barry-passing-on-Hillary thing &#8211; and she seemed confident and competent enough at first&#8230;and then the Couric interview came&#8230;she&#8217;s been fighting for her political life ever since, and people LOVE her. Her lack of education is a major concern for me, and that was the ethos of this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failin&#8217; Sarah Palin by Guy</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/18/failin-sarah-palin/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1218#comment-812</guid>
		<description>This wasn&#039;t a typo. She thought &#039;refudiate&#039; was a real word. She said it at least once on Hannity&#039;s show http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pXaK30qNBM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This wasn&#8217;t a typo. She thought &#8216;refudiate&#8217; was a real word. She said it at least once on Hannity&#8217;s show <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pXaK30qNBM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pXaK30qNBM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failin&#8217; Sarah Palin by Michal Turk</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/18/failin-sarah-palin/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal Turk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1218#comment-811</guid>
		<description>Oh, come on.  I&#039;m no fan of Palin but is a typo really the best argument you can make about her failings?

If we went through the Twitter feed of just about anyone, you would find typos.

Why not focus on her lack of depth on just about any issue, her over-reliance on talking points, or her vacuous performance in interviews?

Picking on a typo just makes you look petty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, come on.  I&#8217;m no fan of Palin but is a typo really the best argument you can make about her failings?</p>
<p>If we went through the Twitter feed of just about anyone, you would find typos.</p>
<p>Why not focus on her lack of depth on just about any issue, her over-reliance on talking points, or her vacuous performance in interviews?</p>
<p>Picking on a typo just makes you look petty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failin&#8217; Sarah Palin by George</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/18/failin-sarah-palin/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 04:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1218#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Doug Hoffman lost NY-23 earlier this year - she&#039;s given lots of candidates a bump, but she&#039;s not made of teflon. Her PAC is raising a lot of money (and as far as I can tell, not really doling it out to lots of her targets), and that&#039;s what leads me to believe that she&#039;s pondering a primary run in 2012. Additionally, she&#039;s driven a lot by her handlers - the very people who would profit as campaign advisors and staffers should they push her to run.

She may not have an expressed interest in running for the White House, but she is both malleable and in love with the spotlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug Hoffman lost NY-23 earlier this year &#8211; she&#8217;s given lots of candidates a bump, but she&#8217;s not made of teflon. Her PAC is raising a lot of money (and as far as I can tell, not really doling it out to lots of her targets), and that&#8217;s what leads me to believe that she&#8217;s pondering a primary run in 2012. Additionally, she&#8217;s driven a lot by her handlers &#8211; the very people who would profit as campaign advisors and staffers should they push her to run.</p>
<p>She may not have an expressed interest in running for the White House, but she is both malleable and in love with the spotlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failin&#8217; Sarah Palin by Ken nichols</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/18/failin-sarah-palin/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken nichols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 22:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1218#comment-806</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the point? It&#039;s already been made clear that she will never represent us in the White House. The fact is that she continues to terrify her opponents, and they can&#039;t seem to get her supporters to turn on her. She&#039;ll never be President, and I&#039;d be surprised to hear that she wants to be President. She&#039;s making millions doing what she wants to do...Has any candidate that she has supported lost yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the point? It&#8217;s already been made clear that she will never represent us in the White House. The fact is that she continues to terrify her opponents, and they can&#8217;t seem to get her supporters to turn on her. She&#8217;ll never be President, and I&#8217;d be surprised to hear that she wants to be President. She&#8217;s making millions doing what she wants to do&#8230;Has any candidate that she has supported lost yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Donning the Red Cap of Liberty by Donning the Red Cap of Liberty &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/14/donning-the-red-cap-of-liberty/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>Donning the Red Cap of Liberty &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1209#comment-798</guid>
		<description>[...] Cross-posted at Intelligence, Please&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross-posted at Intelligence, Please&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 Most-Controversial-But-Important-To-See Movies by Donning the Red Cap of Liberty &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/05/12/top-10-most-controversial-but-important-to-see-movies/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Donning the Red Cap of Liberty &#124; Liberty Pundits Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=969#comment-797</guid>
		<description>[...] Incidentally, this is one of only two films in history that showcases La Marseillaise in its entirety -- I have blogged previously about the other film in which it appears. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Incidentally, this is one of only two films in history that showcases La Marseillaise in its entirety &#8212; I have blogged previously about the other film in which it appears. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Donning the Red Cap of Liberty by Ken Nichols</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/14/donning-the-red-cap-of-liberty/#comment-795</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Nichols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1209#comment-795</guid>
		<description>&quot;Que vive la France&quot;...I got nothin&#039; else (without laughing)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Que vive la France&#8221;&#8230;I got nothin&#8217; else (without laughing)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top 10 Most-Controversial-But-Important-To-See Movies by Donning the Red Cap of Liberty &#171; Intelligence, Please&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/05/12/top-10-most-controversial-but-important-to-see-movies/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Donning the Red Cap of Liberty &#171; Intelligence, Please&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=969#comment-794</guid>
		<description>[...] Incidentally, this is one of only two films in history that showcases La Marseillaise in its entirety &#8211; I have blogged previously about the other film in which it appears. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Incidentally, this is one of only two films in history that showcases La Marseillaise in its entirety &#8211; I have blogged previously about the other film in which it appears. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conservatives, Libertarians, and Purity Tests: Can These Groups Win Without Each Other? by Ken Nichols</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/14/conservatives-libertarians-and-purity-tests-can-these-groups-win-without-each-other/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Nichols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1203#comment-791</guid>
		<description>I think, without a doubt, that the libertarians, conservatives, and independents ALL need each other. I hope and pray that they will all be willing to unite and focus on the basic premise that we need a smaller government, and that government needs to stay out of our lives. Everything else is pointless if we can&#039;t get past these two basic points. If we don&#039;t start winning in November (&quot;winning&quot; meaning getting Democrats out of office nationwide), we will not be able to undo the overwhelming damage to our economy and our personal freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, without a doubt, that the libertarians, conservatives, and independents ALL need each other. I hope and pray that they will all be willing to unite and focus on the basic premise that we need a smaller government, and that government needs to stay out of our lives. Everything else is pointless if we can&#8217;t get past these two basic points. If we don&#8217;t start winning in November (&#8220;winning&#8221; meaning getting Democrats out of office nationwide), we will not be able to undo the overwhelming damage to our economy and our personal freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roll Your Own Matrix by George</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/14/roll-your-own-matrix/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1199#comment-790</guid>
		<description>Pick me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pick me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On the Nature of Austerity by How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Austerity &#171; Intelligence, Please&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/07/on-the-nature-of-austerity/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Austerity &#171; Intelligence, Please&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 21:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1151#comment-772</guid>
		<description>[...] austerity should not result in anything but epic pain for investors. Yet, in a contradiction to my previous post, I am going to condone the use of austerity in the name of market [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] austerity should not result in anything but epic pain for investors. Yet, in a contradiction to my previous post, I am going to condone the use of austerity in the name of market [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Black Panthers, Queen Elizabeth, Condoms, and NASA &#8211; Evening Reading &#8211; July 8, 2010 by Rafael</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/08/black-panthers-queen-elizabeth-condoms-and-nasa-evening-reading-july-8-2010/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1171#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s Re-Election Promise

     The promise of &quot;a chicken in every pot and a car in every garage&quot; can be traced to Hoover&#039;s 1928 Presidential campaign.
     Well, Obama has twisted these words and is promising that if he is re-elected there will be &quot;a chick in every car and some pot in every garage!&quot; (LOL)
     Seriously, to see some forbidden views inside King Barack&#039;s monarchy, Google &quot;Obama Supports Public Depravity&quot; and also Google &quot;Obama...destined to become a black-slavery avenger.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s Re-Election Promise</p>
<p>     The promise of &#8220;a chicken in every pot and a car in every garage&#8221; can be traced to Hoover&#8217;s 1928 Presidential campaign.<br />
     Well, Obama has twisted these words and is promising that if he is re-elected there will be &#8220;a chick in every car and some pot in every garage!&#8221; (LOL)<br />
     Seriously, to see some forbidden views inside King Barack&#8217;s monarchy, Google &#8220;Obama Supports Public Depravity&#8221; and also Google &#8220;Obama&#8230;destined to become a black-slavery avenger.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hot Rod, STAR WARS, and Democratic Politics &#8211; Morning Reading &#8211; July 8, 2010 by Tweets that mention Hot Rod, STAR WARS, and Democratic Politics – Morning Reading – July 8, 2010 « Intelligence, Please… -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/07/08/hot-rod-star-wars-and-democratic-politics-morning-reading-july-8-2010/#comment-761</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Hot Rod, STAR WARS, and Democratic Politics – Morning Reading – July 8, 2010 « Intelligence, Please… -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=1164#comment-761</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by George. George said: Hot Rod, STAR WARS, and Democratic Politics – Morning Reading – July 8, 2010 http://bit.ly/dgb9Zy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by George. George said: Hot Rod, STAR WARS, and Democratic Politics – Morning Reading – July 8, 2010 <a href="http://bit.ly/dgb9Zy" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dgb9Zy</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where&#8217;s My PR? by Hot Rod, STAR WARS, and Democratic Politics &#8211; Morning Reading &#8211; July 8, 2010 &#171; Intelligence, Please&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://intelligenceplease.com/2010/03/20/wheres-my-pr/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Rod, STAR WARS, and Democratic Politics &#8211; Morning Reading &#8211; July 8, 2010 &#171; Intelligence, Please&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligenceplease.com/?p=647#comment-760</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;stimulus&#8221; spending; I even gave a run-down of Rep. Jim Cooper&#8217;s pet projects (none of which help the middle class): The website used to track stimulus spending does not meet the transparency requirements laid out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;stimulus&#8221; spending; I even gave a run-down of Rep. Jim Cooper&#8217;s pet projects (none of which help the middle class): The website used to track stimulus spending does not meet the transparency requirements laid out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
